As was already pointed out by an earlier commenter, Charlie Kirk was prominently boosted by Jack Hibbs, which I felt was a bit... problematic (to erroneously use a word that did not originally mean "a problem," but has been popularly adopted as such). I like Hibbs and have generally found his preaching to be good, although his California surfer persona is slightly off-putting for a serious student of the Bible. I admired the way he stood his ground during the Covid hysteria and continued to hold services, so I can forgive him for other minor infractions, but I am reluctant to endorse his providing a forum for Kirk, who is clearly much more of a politician than evangelist. Sometimes the "enemy of my enemy" strategy is not a good option, especially if it introduces a seriously flawed moral viewpoint into the Christian mainstream. I reject any attempt to normalize homosexuality, given the clear Biblical injunction against its practice. Glossing over that moral failing is a bit like overlooking that little dab of dog poo in the cake mix. I am similarly disposed regarding all of the "conservative homosexuals" adorning our side of the political divide; despite the fact that they may profess "conservative values" in other areas of our political discourse, the fact remains that it has largely been the influence of homosexuals that has brought about our current state of affairs. Homosexuality is antithetical to any civilization that purports to be founded on Biblical principles. Homosexuality and modern-day "feminism" are two manifestations of the same underlying philosophy of unbridled license to indulge sinful inclinations; they both espouse the overthrow of traditional Biblical standards of behavior, including but not limited to the sanctity of marriage and the family as well as the protection of childhood innocence and endorse the grossest kinds of activity in order to do so. So I can not possibly find common cause with the likes of Douglas Murray, Andrew Sullivan, Richard Grenell and the so-called "Log Cabin Republicans," and even less so the trannies like Blaire White or Bruce Jenner. I guess it's OK if they are on the "right" side of most issues and I certainly will no condemn them for that, but I will not stand around and cheer them on either, nor welcome them into my Christian fellowship unless they repent of their sins.
Good morning Jeff, I agree with you on TPUSA, something has bothered me for awhile on that organization...I know Jack Hibbs was/is tied in to Charlie Kirk, what are your thoughts on him, he talks allot of politics through his sermons, just thinking out aloud. Thanks for work you do.
There aren't that many conservatives/conservative organizations left. Sure, there are still many Republicans, but not conservatives. Same with abortion. There are plenty of so-called pro-lifers, but not many abolitionists.
Homosexuality is sin according to God and it is the worst sin because it is a sin against the body…1 Corinthians 6:18 he that committed fornication sins against his on body. Glorify God in your body…1 cor 6:19-20
I haven't trusted Charlie Kirk from the beginning which seemed odd since he was supposedly conservative and a Christian. Something didn't sit right with me but I couldn't pinpoint it. Thank you for posting this and providing solid evidence of what the Holy Spirit was telling me all along.
I don't jump on any band wagons from the getgo without giving their fruits a chance to mature and ripen There is a lot of controlled opposition out there. Anyone with a modicum of intelligence can talk a good game initially, but can they keep it up and avoid the glaring inconsistencies that tend to appear over time?
The Devil's busy sowing tares amidst the wheat: I am particularly highly sceptical of some influencers that seem to materialize overnight out of thin air and make an unusually big splash upon their arrival into preeminence, They are seen and heard all over the place, may be featured and interviewed on already well established "conservative" channels. These Johnny-come-latelys, new kids in town are invariably "conservative."
I realize that anyone can start a YouTube channel or start a blog, or whatever. That's not what I am talking about here.
I watched a couple of episodes of the CHARLIE KIRK roadshow, but he never much impressed me as someone I should stick around for. Just another flash-in-the-pan and I didn't have the time to waste
However with this video post, Charlie seems to have come out of the closet more in favor of showcasing homosexuality. Blatantly rather than latently. His guest is an activist.
This is why I don't trust those that openly practice homosexuality yet claim to decry the LGBTQPIA+ CULT phenomenon. Homosexuality practice is what started the ball rolling on this. You dont like what it is morphing into, then REPENT, TURN FROM your wicked ways and turn Back to God and He will receive you. Go and sin no more!! Until you do so, you will own your part in this spreading evil
Precisely. "Born that Way" plus "the (fabricated) GAY GENE" narrativesbare cover ups for the fact that many gays and lesbians actively "recruit" the young. However, They will do their best to distance themselves from the Pee-doughs whom they insist are invariably white heterosexual males.....prove me wrong
Oh and in your list you inadvertently forgot to include Dave Rubin as one of the poster children for "GAY CONSERVATIVES"....
I gave up on Charlie Kirk along time ago. I couldn’t tell you exactly why, except for the fact that I just sensed by the Holy Spirit, something was wrong.
I fear TPUSA is not alone in conservative movement promoting homosexuals. During the riots Andy Ngo is a self proclaimed homosexual activist but a conservative one in the media. He has done a LOT of good work in the media BUT prominently displays his 'gayness' with the LGBT flag on his Twitter posts. He now is with Post Millennial a publication exposing a number of things but again - same.
Even conservative bastions such as Heritage I have similar concerns when they provide a platform for homosexuals LGB opposing to the TIA+ side... yes, an interesting battle between them but we CANNOT ally with anyone who walks with those tied to the darkness of sexual sin that God abhors.
Well done with this article! I had not thought much about TPUSA until this post and will add them to my list of those to hold at an arms length or more!
Homosexuality is sin according to God and it is the worst sin because it is a sin against the body…1 Corinthians 6:18 he that committed fornication sins against his on body. Glorify God in your body…1 cor 6:19-20
When will the Church finally renounce dispensationalism and its friendliness to antichrist Judaism as a hostile religion hell-bent on defiling and corrupting everything girly and virtuous?
"I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan." Rev 2:9
TPUSA is a neocon promoting arm of secularism and Zionism. You can even name the Name of Christ in their midst as long as you don't say anything about His Lordship, His moral law and His exaltation as Judge of all flesh. So just lower Christ as among the many gods in the pantheon and you will be ok with the very Jewish run [Christ denying, secular] organization they call TPUSA. But if you honor Christ as Lord, then you must make no friendship with those who would "damn Him with faint praise". God hating Muslims are less hostile to Christ than modern day Jews.
I fully agree that modern Judaism is a false religion, and so do many dispensationalists, including Macarthur. There are plenty of things to divide over. Dispensationalism vs covenant theology need not be one of them.
Agreed, more concerning is their target audience... colleges, next generation.
As was already pointed out by an earlier commenter, Charlie Kirk was prominently boosted by Jack Hibbs, which I felt was a bit... problematic (to erroneously use a word that did not originally mean "a problem," but has been popularly adopted as such). I like Hibbs and have generally found his preaching to be good, although his California surfer persona is slightly off-putting for a serious student of the Bible. I admired the way he stood his ground during the Covid hysteria and continued to hold services, so I can forgive him for other minor infractions, but I am reluctant to endorse his providing a forum for Kirk, who is clearly much more of a politician than evangelist. Sometimes the "enemy of my enemy" strategy is not a good option, especially if it introduces a seriously flawed moral viewpoint into the Christian mainstream. I reject any attempt to normalize homosexuality, given the clear Biblical injunction against its practice. Glossing over that moral failing is a bit like overlooking that little dab of dog poo in the cake mix. I am similarly disposed regarding all of the "conservative homosexuals" adorning our side of the political divide; despite the fact that they may profess "conservative values" in other areas of our political discourse, the fact remains that it has largely been the influence of homosexuals that has brought about our current state of affairs. Homosexuality is antithetical to any civilization that purports to be founded on Biblical principles. Homosexuality and modern-day "feminism" are two manifestations of the same underlying philosophy of unbridled license to indulge sinful inclinations; they both espouse the overthrow of traditional Biblical standards of behavior, including but not limited to the sanctity of marriage and the family as well as the protection of childhood innocence and endorse the grossest kinds of activity in order to do so. So I can not possibly find common cause with the likes of Douglas Murray, Andrew Sullivan, Richard Grenell and the so-called "Log Cabin Republicans," and even less so the trannies like Blaire White or Bruce Jenner. I guess it's OK if they are on the "right" side of most issues and I certainly will no condemn them for that, but I will not stand around and cheer them on either, nor welcome them into my Christian fellowship unless they repent of their sins.
Good morning Jeff, I agree with you on TPUSA, something has bothered me for awhile on that organization...I know Jack Hibbs was/is tied in to Charlie Kirk, what are your thoughts on him, he talks allot of politics through his sermons, just thinking out aloud. Thanks for work you do.
Shocking! Biblical Ignorance is appalling! Thanks for sharing!
There aren't that many conservatives/conservative organizations left. Sure, there are still many Republicans, but not conservatives. Same with abortion. There are plenty of so-called pro-lifers, but not many abolitionists.
Homosexuality is sin according to God and it is the worst sin because it is a sin against the body…1 Corinthians 6:18 he that committed fornication sins against his on body. Glorify God in your body…1 cor 6:19-20
I haven't trusted Charlie Kirk from the beginning which seemed odd since he was supposedly conservative and a Christian. Something didn't sit right with me but I couldn't pinpoint it. Thank you for posting this and providing solid evidence of what the Holy Spirit was telling me all along.
I don't jump on any band wagons from the getgo without giving their fruits a chance to mature and ripen There is a lot of controlled opposition out there. Anyone with a modicum of intelligence can talk a good game initially, but can they keep it up and avoid the glaring inconsistencies that tend to appear over time?
The Devil's busy sowing tares amidst the wheat: I am particularly highly sceptical of some influencers that seem to materialize overnight out of thin air and make an unusually big splash upon their arrival into preeminence, They are seen and heard all over the place, may be featured and interviewed on already well established "conservative" channels. These Johnny-come-latelys, new kids in town are invariably "conservative."
I realize that anyone can start a YouTube channel or start a blog, or whatever. That's not what I am talking about here.
I watched a couple of episodes of the CHARLIE KIRK roadshow, but he never much impressed me as someone I should stick around for. Just another flash-in-the-pan and I didn't have the time to waste
However with this video post, Charlie seems to have come out of the closet more in favor of showcasing homosexuality. Blatantly rather than latently. His guest is an activist.
This is why I don't trust those that openly practice homosexuality yet claim to decry the LGBTQPIA+ CULT phenomenon. Homosexuality practice is what started the ball rolling on this. You dont like what it is morphing into, then REPENT, TURN FROM your wicked ways and turn Back to God and He will receive you. Go and sin no more!! Until you do so, you will own your part in this spreading evil
Yep. The whole gays against groomers thing is in the same category.
Precisely. "Born that Way" plus "the (fabricated) GAY GENE" narrativesbare cover ups for the fact that many gays and lesbians actively "recruit" the young. However, They will do their best to distance themselves from the Pee-doughs whom they insist are invariably white heterosexual males.....prove me wrong
Oh and in your list you inadvertently forgot to include Dave Rubin as one of the poster children for "GAY CONSERVATIVES"....
I agree 100%.
I gave up on Charlie Kirk along time ago. I couldn’t tell you exactly why, except for the fact that I just sensed by the Holy Spirit, something was wrong.
I fear TPUSA is not alone in conservative movement promoting homosexuals. During the riots Andy Ngo is a self proclaimed homosexual activist but a conservative one in the media. He has done a LOT of good work in the media BUT prominently displays his 'gayness' with the LGBT flag on his Twitter posts. He now is with Post Millennial a publication exposing a number of things but again - same.
Even conservative bastions such as Heritage I have similar concerns when they provide a platform for homosexuals LGB opposing to the TIA+ side... yes, an interesting battle between them but we CANNOT ally with anyone who walks with those tied to the darkness of sexual sin that God abhors.
Well done with this article! I had not thought much about TPUSA until this post and will add them to my list of those to hold at an arms length or more!
Homosexuality is sin according to God and it is the worst sin because it is a sin against the body…1 Corinthians 6:18 he that committed fornication sins against his on body. Glorify God in your body…1 cor 6:19-20
What TPUSA is doing is letting the sodomites in to the conservative movement thru the back door (pun intended).
When will the Church finally renounce dispensationalism and its friendliness to antichrist Judaism as a hostile religion hell-bent on defiling and corrupting everything girly and virtuous?
"I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan." Rev 2:9
TPUSA is a neocon promoting arm of secularism and Zionism. You can even name the Name of Christ in their midst as long as you don't say anything about His Lordship, His moral law and His exaltation as Judge of all flesh. So just lower Christ as among the many gods in the pantheon and you will be ok with the very Jewish run [Christ denying, secular] organization they call TPUSA. But if you honor Christ as Lord, then you must make no friendship with those who would "damn Him with faint praise". God hating Muslims are less hostile to Christ than modern day Jews.
Sorry, but I completely disagree with your statement on all accounts.
Disagree with you on the dispensationalism. Totally disagree with you. Dispensationalism is clear to see for anyone with eyes to see.
I fully agree that modern Judaism is a false religion, and so do many dispensationalists, including Macarthur. There are plenty of things to divide over. Dispensationalism vs covenant theology need not be one of them.
Couldn’t agree more!