Why Would Leftists Like David French NOT Want Criminal Gangs to be Deported?

Imagine for a moment that, and I know this is very unlikely. But imagine that you took the advice of the “urban mandate” hypocrites. You know, the ones, like Tim Keller, who live(d) in high-security condos, gated communities, etc. who are always lecturing us about how it’s sinful not to plant our lives and our families in the middle of run-down rat-infested neighborhoods because of some “mandate” they’ve made up and slapped a Christian mission label on it.

Now, imagine you’re walking down your neighborhood street, the same street where your kids ride their bikes and your neighbor waves from his front porch. And imagine that just a few blocks over, in a run-down apartment complex shielded by bureaucratic neglect and progressive compassion, a cartel-affiliated gang is operating with impunity, smuggling fentanyl, trafficking children, and murdering the innocent—all under the benevolent gaze of the woke ruling class.

That’s not a dystopian novel. That’s America under the stewardship of radical leftists and enabled by men like Chief Justice John Roberts and his ever-loyal scribes, like David French. The latest controversy surrounding Roberts’ pronouncement against judicial impeachment isn’t about protecting the Constitution—it’s about protecting the left’s golden goose: mass, unvetted migration and the societal collapse it ensures.

The issue at hand? An Obama-appointed judge’s refusal to allow the deportation of known Venezuelan gang members despite a lower court ruling demanding it. Now, these aren’t wayward teenagers shoplifting energy drinks, these are hardened criminals, many associated with the infamous Tren de Aragua cartel, a violent Venezuelan gang that has metastasized across South America and is now infecting U.S. cities.

They traffic women and children like livestock, pump deadly fentanyl into the bloodstream of America’s youth, and slaughter anyone who dares challenge their reign of terror.

But instead of siding with law and order, the judiciary—those black-robed bureaucrats—decided that enforcing immigration law was a bridge too far. When President Trump, seeing the insanity for what it is, called for the impeachment of the judge responsible for blocking these deportations, Roberts rushed to the defense of his colleague. Because, of course, impeachment isn’t for activist judges who bend the law to protect cartel operatives—it’s only for duly elected presidents who threaten the hegemony of the state-worshiping elite.

Enter David French, professional hand-wringer and perennial apologist for whatever leftist assault is currently being waged against American sovereignty. French, ever eager to remind conservatives of their civic duty to surrender, rushed to the defense of Roberts with a proclamation so devoid of self-awareness it might as well have been written by ChatGPT with a New York Times subscription.

“The judiciary does not answer to the president,” he chirps, as if Trump were demanding personal fealty rather than the enforcement of immigration laws passed by Congress. But let’s ask the questions French and his colleagues refuse to answer: