The Dissenter

The Dissenter

Share this post

The Dissenter
The Dissenter
Kat Kerr Says God Struck Animals in the Garden Mute So They Couldn't Fall, Don't Need to Repent to be Saved

Kat Kerr Says God Struck Animals in the Garden Mute So They Couldn't Fall, Don't Need to Repent to be Saved

Jeff's avatar
Jeff
Sep 19, 2024
∙ Paid
13

Share this post

The Dissenter
The Dissenter
Kat Kerr Says God Struck Animals in the Garden Mute So They Couldn't Fall, Don't Need to Repent to be Saved
8
Share

Our favorite pink-haired prophetess, Kat Kerr, has recently graced us with her theological wisdom once again. This time, she wants us to believe that after the fall, God took away animals' ability to speak so they wouldn't sin.

Apparently, God was so worried about parrots preaching heresy and dogs debating moral philosophy that He decided the only solution was to strike them mute. Because, clearly, the real threat in the Garden wasn’t Satan’s deceitful words, but a chatty Labrador who might have convinced Eve to pick the apple first.

Seriously, how does she expect anyone to believe this? Is Kerr actually suggesting that all of creation was teetering on the brink of ruin until God silenced the animal kingdom to prevent a fur-filled moral catastrophe?

The Bible is crystal clear—only humans were created in the image of God, and only humans were held responsible for sin (Genesis 1:27). Adam and Eve were tested, not their pets. So why in the world would God bother with the speech faculties of animals as if they were sitting on the fence between righteousness and rebellion? Are we seriously supposed to buy this nonsense?

Watch:

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Jeff Maples
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share