Idaho Drafts Resolution to Overturn Obergefell, and Leftists are Going Crazy
Leftists and LGBT activists are predictably losing their collective minds over Idaho’s new resolution against Obergefell v. Hodges, and frankly, it’s a spectacle worthy of popcorn. Like vampires hissing at the sunlight, homosexuals, queers, and every sexual deviant under the sun are recoiling at the thought that their pet project of societal deconstruction might finally face the scrutiny it has long deserved.
They claim to stand for “justice” and “equality,” but their real fear is glaringly obvious, they’re terrified that their grotesque crimes against nature, humanity, and God will have to retreat back into the shadows—where they belong—instead of being paraded around to the world as a badge of “progress” while the rest of us reflexively gag on what they’re force-feeding us.
The Idaho resolution, a joint memorial of the state’s legislature, doesn’t pussyfoot. It calls out Obergefell as an illegitimate overreach, a decision that “arbitrarily and unjustly rejected” the time-tested definition of marriage in favor of “a novel, flawed interpretation” of the Constitution.
The resolution correctly identifies that Obergefell relies on the “dangerous fiction of treating the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as a font of substantive rights,” a doctrine that gives unelected judges power they were never meant to have.
In simpler terms, the Supreme Court fancied itself a legislative body and trampled over the will of the people, the Constitution, and 2,000 years of moral sanity—all in one fell swoop.
Idaho’s resolution methodically dismantles the lies propped up by Obergefell. The court’s majority opinion, it notes, undermined the Framers’ understanding of liberty as individual freedom from governmental action and replaced it with the absurd notion that “dignity” comes from a government-issued marriage license. As if dignity, the immutable worth given by God Himself, could be conferred by bureaucrats.
The resolution skewers this claim as an affront to the Declaration of Independence’s affirmation that all men are “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.” One can almost hear the leftists gnashing their teeth at such an unfiltered declaration of truth. After all, they have no use for God in their worldview—only the almighty State.
Predictably, the usual suspects are wailing in unison. The ACLU of Idaho, clutching their pearls, declared that while the resolution is not legally binding, “it is harmful nonetheless because it is a clear statement to LGBTQ+ communities that they are undeserving of equal access to rights that are afforded to anyone else.”
Harmful? What’s more harmful—standing for truth, or dismantling the foundational institution of marriage to placate cultural revolutionaries?