California’s Radical LGBTQ Agenda is a Preview of National Policy if Gavin Newsom Elected
Rumors are swirling that President Joe Biden may soon drop out of the 2024 presidential race, following his recent COVID-19 diagnosis and a series of concerning public gaffes. Despite the White House's denials, insider reports suggest Biden is seriously considering stepping aside. This move could pave the way for California Governor Gavin Newsom to become the Democratic nominee, a scenario that would spell disaster for parental rights and the moral fabric of our nation.
It’s becoming increasingly clear that the Democratic Party has been orchestrating Biden’s exit for months. His faltering health and cognitive missteps have only accelerated this process. If Biden steps down, it opens the door for Newsom to step in—a calculated move to install a candidate who can carry forward the most radical aspects of the left's agenda without the baggage of Biden’s failures.
After all, why keep Grandpa Gaffe around wandering aimlessly, and who can’t even remember where he is most of the time, when Gavin Newsom is ready and willing to spread California’s systemic dysfunction coast to coast?
On July 15, 2024, California passed Assembly Bill 1955, a piece of legislation that epitomizes Newsom’s radical agenda. This law mandates that schools must encourage the participation of students in programs that support LGBTQ+ “health services,” including mental health services without parental consent. It enforces the idea that children can decide on gender identity and related health services independently of their parents, severely undermining parental authority.
This bill is not just a one-off. It reflects Newsom’s broader approach to governance, one that prioritizes aberrant sexual activism over traditional family values and parental rights. If Newsom becomes president, we can expect this radical agenda to be implemented on a national scale, threatening the very foundation of parental rights in America.
Under Newsom’s leadership, California has become a testing ground for policies that erode the family unit. AB 1955 is a prime example, as it essentially allows schools to keep parents in the dark about critical aspects of their children's lives. The bill’s provisions for “Health Days” to provide screenings and medical referrals without parental consent are a direct assault on the rights of parents to guide their children's upbringing.